Northeastern Policies and Legal Notices

NP 3-31f - Appendix F - Abbreviated Faculty Performance Plan and Evaluation Form

Employee Name: _____________________________                     S-Number: _____________________

Supervisor Name: _____________________________                   Department: ____________________

Evaluation Period From: __________ To: __________                    Campus: _______________________

Previous Years Evaluation:  ____ Standard  _____ Abbreviated 

This form is meant to be used in conjunction with NP3-31 which outlines the basis, definitions, and procedures of the evaluation procedure. If there is a discrepancy between this form and NP3-31, procedures set forth in NP3-31 will take precedence.

It is important to note the change of focus from the previous NP3-31. There is much less emphasis on goals and more emphasis on excellence within the faculty members’ individual role. Additionally, the focus on efforts to complete goals should also be incorporated into conversations. Conversations should focus on the faculty members, “documented responsibilities, job description, and efforts to complete goals”.

Faculty members who have completed five years of continuous service as a Faculty member at NJC and have achieved a Commendable rating for each of the last five years may, in agreement with their supervisor, may opt for an Abbreviated Faculty Performance Plan and Evaluation. The Abbreviated Plan differs from the Standard Plan in the following ways:

  • There are only two required meetings. One for the initial plan and one for the end-of-year summary.
  • Classroom observations by the Department Chair/Director are not required.
  • Student course evaluations will be completed with the faculty member choosing one class and the Department Chair/Director choosing one class.
  • The Initial plan does not require the same focus on goals as the Standard plan. Instead, Faculty may work with their supervisor to create an abbreviated plan for the year.

The Abbreviated Plan is intended to allow more flexibility for both the faculty member and their supervisor. It should include a summary of what the faculty member intends to accomplish for the year in teaching and service. The individual Department Chair/Director has the discretion to determine what constitutes an Abbreviated Plan for their department. The content of the plan should be developed in consultation with the faculty member.

The performance evaluation process is a collaborative effort between the faculty member and their supervisor. It is important that faculty member and supervisor collaborate on this document throughout the year and that each party understands the expectations of the other party. There are a minimum of two (2) required meetings throughout the year and the faculty member should complete (by typing) the appropriate section for each meeting prior to meeting with their supervisor.

  • Meeting 1 – Initial plan (May 15 – September 30); agreement should be reached on the faculty members plan for the year. The plan must be approved by the Vice President for Academic Affairs prior to September 30th.
  • Meeting 2 – End-of-year summary (April 15 to June 15); faculty member will prepare a reflective summary of their activities for the year including the contribution and outcome of those activities to teaching, service and their performance goals.

Faculty Initial Plan (May 15 – September 30).

Faculty: Based on your job responsibilities and position description, identify your teaching and service plan.

 

Faculty End-of-year summary (April 15 to June 15)

Provide a reflective summary of your performance throughout the year including a

focus on how your plan was or was not completed as intended and how this may be reflected in next year’s goals.

 

Supervisor FINAL narrative (June 15th)

Enter comments about the faculty member's end-of-year reflection on their plan for the year, your observation of their work, student evaluations, job responsibilities, and position description and provide rationale for the final performance rating including your recommendation for a Standard or Abbreviated plan for next year.

 

Faculty Performance Plan and Evaluation

Signature Page

                   

Faculty member:

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

Academic Year:

 

 

 

 

 

 

   
                   

Initial Teaching and Service Goals

 

 

 

 

 

 

                   
                   

Faculty Member

 

 

Date

 

Supervisor

 

Date

                   

 

 

 

 

 

         

Vice President of Academic Affairs

Date

         
                   

Mid-Year Comments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                   
                   

Faculty Member

 

 

Date

 

Supervisor

 

Date

                   

Final Evaluation and Performance Rating

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overall Performance Evaluation Rating (based on definitions of performance ratings as described in NP3-31.

 

 

  Exemplary

           
 

 

  Commendable

           
 

 

Needs Improvement

         
                   

I have read and received a copy of the above performance evaluation. I Agree / Disagree* (circle one) with the overall performance evaluation/rating.

                   

Faculty Member

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date

                   

I have reviewed Student Faculty Evaluations, conducted classroom observations, considered the faculty members position description and the Statement of Teaching Excellence in completing my evaluation of this faculty member.

                   

Supervisor

           

Date

 
                   

VP of Academic Affairs

         

Date

 
                   

*Disagreement does not automatically constitute an appeal of the evaluation. If a faculty member wishes to appeal their written evaluation and overall performance rating, they must follow the appeal procedure as stipulated in NP3-20.